Recent trends in health care coverage may be the harbingers of a return to a more personal relationship
between physicians and their patients. While offices will have to make some adjustments to accommodate the
changes, we believe the changes are definitely for the better.
Consider the current scenario in healthcare. Employers are frustrated with seemingly out of control costs.
Providers are irritated with having to "treat" the patient's coverage rather than their problems. In addition,
providers are expected to be experts in a multitude of third party plans.
Patients are confused because they
don't understand their own coverage and the financial constraints placed upon the providers. To make things
worse, patients often take out their confusion on the provider's staff. Finally, even third party payers are
exasperated as they are expected to control costs and quality from a distance.
Third party payers unwittingly intervened in the hallowed doctor/ patient relationship when they expanded
coverage from major medical and hospitalization to basic office visits (in their defense, they responded
to market pressures). Needless to say, this "third party wedge" has strained the doctor/ patient relationship
and created a scenario fraught with problems. The payer is not present when services are delivered. The payer
can delay payment and question what occurred during the visit. The consumer feels little or no responsibility
for payment.
But there is change in the air. In recent years, employers began to shift more of the cost of health
care on to their employees. Rarely does an employer pay 100% of the premium any more. The shifting of
the cost burden typically has been in reduced coverage, fewer riders, single coverage only, (the employee
has to pay the balance for family coverage), higher annual deductibles, higher co-insurance percentages,
and higher office copays. Clearly, the patient is paying for more and more of the office visits out of
pocket. The trend towards "retail" medicine, cash at the time services are rendered, is evident.
A bigger push towards "retail" medicine could come from employers who will offer their employees the
"old style" major medical and hospital insurance (catastrophic coverage) in conjunction with a medical
savings account. Employees will have an account to cover all of their non-catastrophic medical expenses
which will include office visits and office based procedures. The money not expended can be rolled over
into the next year or invested in their retirement plan. Eventually, practices will be paid in cash by
the patient at the time of service for the majority of their office based business. There will be less
and less third party billing. Will you be ready for retail?
A lot of good may result from this trend towards "retail" medicine. In this scenario, the third
party payer will be removed from the doctor/ patient relationship, at least in the office setting.
What is covered or not will be inconsequential as the insurer won't be responsible. Physicians will
be free to treat the patient instead of their insurance. Patients will be more compliant and
proactive when they are using their money, (medical savings account) to pay for services. Practices
can institute separate (somewhat lower) fee schedules for cash paying patients because there are no
billing costs or insurance related (i.e. the hassle factor) costs. Receivables should drop considerably.
(If you have a reduced fee schedule for these patients paying in cash, collect it that day. Don't end
up sending them a bill!)
Conceivably, coding may not be an issue, but we recommend you continue to do so if only to track
productivity. You won't have to link an approved diagnosis to the visit in order to get paid
because there is no carrier looking over your shoulder. There will be no more confusion over
deductibles, coinsurance or copays. You will not be restricted to a certain number of visits or
by third party protocol. You won't need prior authorization. There won't be a preferred panel of
providers limiting a patient's choice.
You should be prepared for the trend to cash payment. Patients could/should be more demanding
if they are paying you directly. They will have options and may vote with their feet. Just as
you won't be restricted by a prescribed network of providers, neither will they. The paying
customer just might be less tolerant of inconvenient parking, poor telephone systems, lengthy
appointment lead times, excessive waiting times, unfriendly staff, and a feeling they are not
valued customers. Despite some minor operational adjustments you may have to make, all things
considered, the trend towards retail medicine should be a boon to both physicians and their patients.